Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Kaur, Manpreet
- Breeding Vegetables for Protected Cultivation: A Review
Abstract Views :74 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
2 Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, IN
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
2 Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 47, No 1 (2021), Pagination: 1-17Abstract
Protected cultivation of vegetable crops was given a high priority and developed very rapidly during the past 15 years in India. Initially, vegetable cultivars commonly used for open field production were also started to grown under protected conditions. Despite various measures, many problems arose due to unfavorable ecological conditions in protected environments. Since the late 1980’s and early 1990’s, breeding of vegetable cultivars for protected conditions has been carried out by taking advantages of both conventional methods and biotechnological tools. One of the main research efforts include screening and evaluation of breeding materials for tolerance to various biotic and abiotic stresses. Another effort focused on the creation and development of new breeding materials (variety, cultivar or breeding line) for protected conditions by selection, introduction, crossing and biotechnological methods, including isolating from popular F genotypes, wide crosses, tissue and 1 cell culture, protoplast regeneration, gene transfer techniques, molecular marker assisted breeding and many other approaches. As most hydroponic cultivation and grafting tools are carried out inside the protected conditions, more cultivars adapted to this type of culture are also urgently needed.Keywords
Breeding, Grafting, Hydroponic, Protected Cultivation, Vegetable.Full Text
References
- Adetula OA. 2006. Genetic diversity of Capsicum using random amplified polymorphic DNAs. African Journal of Biotechnology 5: 120-22.
- Allard RW. 1960. Principles of Plant Breeding. John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, 485pp.
- Altunlu H and Gul A. 2012. Increasing drought tolerance of tomato plants by grafting. Acta Horticulture 960: 18390. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2012.960.26
- Anonymous. 2018. Economy of India. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy of India.
- Baille A. 2001. Trends in greenhouse technology for improved climate control in mild winter climates. Acta Hortulture 559 : 161-67. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2001.559.23.
- Balashov ES. 2006. Features of growth and development of new tomato hybrids under cultivation in the extended cycle of winter glazed greenhouse. Ph D thesis, AllRussian Research Institute of Vegetable Growing, Moscow.
- Bhardwaj A. 2017. Development of parthenocarpic gynoecious lines in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) for protected cultivation. Ph D thesis, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur.
- Bhatt RM, Upreti KK, Divya MH, Bhat S, Pavithra CB and Sadashiva AT. 2015. Interspeciûc grafting to enhance physiological resilience to flooding stress in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Scientia Horticulture 182: 8-17.
- Bosland PW and Votava EJ. (Eds), 2012. Peppers. In: Vegetable and Spice Capsicums J. Atherton and A. Rees (Eds.), CABI Publishing, 19999.
- Campbell RN and Grogan RC. 1963. Big-vein virus of lettuce and its transmission by Olpidium brassicae. Phytopathology 53: 252-59.
- Castilla N, Hernandez J and Abou-Hadid AF. 2004. Strategic crop and greenhouse management in mild winter climate areas. Acta Horticulture 633: 183-96. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.633.22
- Chandra P, Sirohi PS, Behera TK and Singh AK. 2000. Cultivating vegetables in polyhouse. Indian Horticulture 45: 17-25.
- Cheema DS, Singh N and Jindal SK. 2013. Evaluation of indeterminate tomato hybrids for fruit, yield and quality traits under net house and open field conditions. Vegetable Science 40: 45-49.
- Chen HX and Cao PS. 1994. Parthenocarpy of cucumber. China Vegetable 3: 56-59.
- Davis AR, Perkins-Veazie P, Hassell R, Levi A, King SR and Zhang X. 2008. Grafting effects on vegetable quality. Horticulture Science 43: 1670-72.
- Dhaliwal MS and Jindal SK. 2017. Development of Cherry tomato variety from interspecific cross (Solanum lycopersicum and Solanum pimpinellifoilium) for protected cultivation. Agriculture Research Journal 54: 182-187.
- Dinuba CA, Singh DK and Tewari D. 2009. Polyhouse breeding of tomato. Agropedia http://agropedia.iitk.ac.in/content/polyhouse-breedingtomato.
- Epstein L, Kaur S, Chang P, Carrasquilla-Garcia N, Lyu G, Cook D, Subbarao K and O’Donnell K. 2017. Races of the celery pathogen. Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. apii are polyphyletic. Phytopathology 107: 463-73. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-04-16-0174-R
- FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization). 2013. Good agricultural practices for greenhouse vegetable Crops.
- FAO plant production and protection paper. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
- Feng C, Correll JC, Kammeijer KE and Koike ST. 2014. Identification of new races and deviating strains of the spinach downy mildew pathogen. Peronospora
- farinose f. sps pinaciae. Plant Disease 98: 145-52. doi: 10.1094/pdis-04-13-0435-re.
- Feng C, Saito K, Liu B, Manley A, Kammeijer K, Mauzey SJ, Koike S and Correll JC. 2018. New races and novel strains of the spinach downy mildew pathogen Peronospora effuse. Plant Disease 102: 613-18. doi: 10.1094/pdis-05-17-0781-re.
- Flores FB, Sanchez-Bel P, Estan MT, Morales B, Campos JF and Egea MI. 2010. The effectiveness of grafting to improve tomato fruit quality. Scientia Horticulture 125: 211-17. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/ j.scienta.2010.03.026.
- Foolad MR. 2007. Genome mapping and molecular breeding of tomato. International Journal of Plant Genomics, 64358. doi:10.1155/2007/64358.
- Garibaldi A, Baudino M, Minuto A and Gullino ML. 2008. Effectiveness of fumigants and grafting against tomato brown root rot caused by Colletotrichum coccodes. Phytoparasitica 36: 483-88.
- Gavrish SF. 2015. Modern hybrids tomato and cucumber. Gavrish 4: 25.
- Gazquez JC, Perez C, Meca DE, Segura MD, Domene MA, Lopez JC and Buendia D. 2017. Evaluation of different training systems and crop densities to increase greenhouse tomato rocution and profitablility in the Mediterranean area. Acta Horticulture 1170: 777-82. doi: 10.17660/acta horticulture.2017.1170.99
- Gilardi G, Colla P, Pugliese M, Baudino M, Gullino ML and Garibaldi A. 2014. Control of Colletotrichum coccodes on tomato by grafting and soil amendments. Journal of Phytopathology 162: 116-23. doi: 10.1111/jph.12162
- Goncharova NA, Van Der VA and Verstegen JAAM. 2004. Changes in horticulture sector in the Netherlands. Acta Horticulture 655: 319-31. doi: 10.17660/actahortic.2004.655.39
- Green SK. 1986. Virus disease of tomato and Chinese cabbage in Taiwan and source of resistance. Plant virus diseases of horticultural crops in the tropics & subtropics. AVRDC , pp.71-83.
- Greenleaf WH. 1986. Pepper Breeding. In: Breeding Vegetable Crops, Westport, USA, AVI Publishing Co., pp 67-134.
- Heuberger H, Praeger U, Georgi M, Schirrmacher G, Grabmann J and Schnitzler WH. 2004. Precision stressing by UV-B rafiation to improve quality of spinach under protected cultivation. Proc. VII IS on Prot Cult Mild Winter Climates (Eds. Cantliffe D J, Stoffella P J and Shaw N) Acta Horticulture 659, 20106.
- Hochmuth GJ and Hochmuth R. 2009. Blossom-end rot in bell pepper: causes and prevention. SL 284, Institute of Food and Agriculture Science, University of Florida, pp. 5.
- Hou F, Wenyun C, Zhenrong H, Shuju L and Dehua M. 1995. New cucumber variety for sunlight greenhouse cultivation - Jinchun No. 3. China Vegetable 2: 6-8.
- Irish BM, Correll JC, Feng C, Bentley T and De Los Reyes BG. 2008. Characterization of a resistance locus (Pfs1) to the spinach downy mildew pathogen (Peronospora farinosef.spspinaciae) and development of a molecular marker linked to Pfs-1. Phytopathology 98: 894-900. doi: 10.1094/phyto-98-8-0894
- Jang Y, Yang E, Cho M, Um Y, Ko K, Chun C. 2012. Effect of grafting on growth and incidence of Phytophthora blight and bacterial wilt of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Horticulture Environment and Biotechnology 53: 9-19. doi: 10.1007/s13580-012-0074-7
- Janick J. 1986. Horticultural Science (4th Edn), Freeman WH and Co., New York, USA, pp 339-46.
- Joshi S and Berke T. 2005. Perspectives of bell pepper breeding. Journal of new seeds 6: 51-74. doi: 10.1300/J153v06n02_04.
- Kacira M. 2011. Greenhouse production in US: status, challenges, and opportunities. In: Presented at CIGR 2011 conference on sustainable bioproduction, Tokyo.
- Kalia P. 2005. Precision protected vegetable cultivation. In: Hi Tech Farming in Vegetable Crops. CAFT in Horticulture (Vegetables), YSP UHF, Nauni, Solan, pp 18-21.
- Kalloo G, Banerjee MK, Kumar S and Prakash C. 2000. Hybrid vegetable technology in India- An overview. In: Kalloo G and Singh K. (Eds.), Emerging Scenario in Vegetable Research and Development. Research Periodicals and Book Publishing House, India, 11-31 pp.
- Karlsson M. 2016. Growing Cucumber in greenhouses. University of Alaska Fairbanks.
- Kim S, Park M and Yeom SI. 2014. Genome sequence of the hot pepper provides insights into the evolution of pungency in Capsicum species. Nature Genetics 46: 271-78. doi: 10.1038/ng.2877
- King SR, Davis AR, Liu W and Levi A. 2008. Grafting for disease resistance. Hort Science 43: 1673-76. doi: 10.21273/hortsci.43.6.1673.
- Kohli UK, Amit V, Manish K and Dohroo NP. 2010. Strategy for production of Exotic vegetables in India. In: Exotic Vegetables. Westville Publishing House, New Delhi. pp 120.
- Kubota C, Mcclure MA, Kokalis-Burelle N, Bausher MG and Rosskopf EN. 2008. Vegetable grafting: History, use, and current technology status in North America. Hort Science 43: 1664-69. doi: 10.21273/hortsci.43.6.1664
- Kumar PY, Rouphael M, Cardarelli G and Colla G. 2017. Vegetable grafting as a tool to improve drought resistance and water use efûciency. Frontiers in Plant Science 8: 1130. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01130
- Kumar S, Gowda P and Mallikarjuna NM. 2015. Evaluation of selected tomato lines for extended shelf life.SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics 47: 32634.
- Kumar S, Kumar R, Kumar D, Gautam N, Dogra RK and Mehta DK. 2016. Parthenocarpicgynoecious parental lines of cucumber introduced from Netherlands for developing high-yielding, quality hybrids. Journal of crop improvement 30: 352-69. doi: 10.1080/ 5427528.2016.1163762
- Kunwar S, Paret ML, Olson SM, Ritchie L, Rich JR, Freeman JH and Mcavoy T. 2015. Grafting root stocks with resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum against Meloidogyne incognita in tomato production. Plant Disease 99: 119-24. doi: 10.1094/pdis-09-13-0936-re
- La Malfa G and Leonardi C. 1993. Crop practices and techniques: trends and needs. Acta Horticulture 559: 31-42. doi: 10.17660/actahortic.2001.559.1
- Lee JM and Oda M. 2003. Grafting of herbaceous vegetable and ornamental crops. Horticultural Reviews 28: 61124.
- Lee JM, Jahn MM and Yeam I. 2013. Allelic relationships at the pvr1 locus in Capsicum annuum. Euphytica 194: 417-24. doi: 10.1007/s10681-013-0967-2.
- Lee JM, Kubota C, Tsao SJ, Bie Z, Hoyos E, Morra L and Oda M. 2010. Current status of vegetable grafting: diffusion, grafting techniques, automation. Scientia Horticulture 127: 93-105. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.08.003.
- Lenecci MS, Cadinu D, Taurino M, Piro G and Dalessandro G. 2006. Antioxidant composition in cherry and high pigment tomato cultivars. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 54: 2606-13. doi: 10.1021/jf052920c.
- Lin C, Hsu S, Tzeng K and Wang J. 2008. Application of a preliminary screen to select locally adapted resistant rootstock and soil amendment for integrated management of tomato bacterial wilt in Taiwan. Plant Disease 92: 909-916. doi: 10.1094/pdis-92-6-0909
- Lopez-Marin J, Galvez A, Del Amar FM, Albecete A, Fernandez JA, Egea-Gilabert C and Perez-Alfocea F.
- Selecting vegetative/ generative/dwarfing rootstocks for improving fruit yield and quality in water stressed sweet peppers. Scientia Horticulture 214: 9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.11.012.
- Lopez-Marin J, Gonzalez A, Perez-Alfocea F, EgeaGilabert C and Fernandez JA. 2013. Grafting is an efficient alternative to shading screens to alleviate thermal stress in greenhouse-grown sweet pepper. Scientia Horticulture 149: 39-46. doi: 10.1016/ j.scienta.2012.02.034.
- Lopez-Perez JA, Strange ML, Kaloshian I and Ploeg AT. 2006. Differential response of mi gene-resistant tomato rootstocks to root-knot nematodes. (Meloidogyne incognita). Crop Protection 25: 382-88. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2005.07.001
- Martinez-Andujar C, Ruiz-Lozano JM, Dodd IC, Albacete A and Perez-Alfocea F. 2017. Hormonal and nutritional features in contrasting rootstock-mediated tomato growth under low phosphorus nutrition. Frontiers Plant Science: 533. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00533
- Mcavoy T, Paret M, Freeman JH, Rideout S, Olson SM. 2012. Evaluation of grafting using hybrid rootstocks for management of bacterial wilt in ûeld tomato production. Hort Science 47: 621-25. doi: 10.21273/hortsci.47.5.621
- Medina-Filho HP and Stevens MA. 1980. Tomato breeding for nematode resistance: Survey of resistant varieties for horticultural characteristics and genotype of acid phosphates. Acta Horticulture 100: 383-91. doi: 10.17660/actahortic.1980.100.41
- Meng XD, Ma H, Wei M and Xing YX. 1999. Breeding of vegetable crops for protected growing conditions. Acta Horticulture 481: 695-99. doi: 10.17660/actahortic.1999.481.83
- Mero CE. 1983. The inheritance of bolt resistance in an interspecific cross Siberian kale (Brassica napus) x Chinese cabbage (B. campestris ssp. pekinensis) and an intraspecific cross Chinese cabbage x turnip (B. campestris ssp. rapifera), Ph. D. thesis Abstract 44: 701-02.
- Mishra GP, Singh N, Kumar H and Singh SB. 2010. Protected Cultivation for food and nutritional Security at Ladakh. Defence Science Journal 61: 219-25.
- Mishra SN, Sahoo SC, Lotha RE and Mishra RS. 1991. Heterosis and combining ability for seed characters in chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 61: 123-25.
- More TA and Budgujar CD. 2002. Isolation of parthenocarpic tropical gynoecious lines in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Acta Horticultural 588: 255-60. doi: 10.17660/actahortic.2002.588.39
- More TA and Munger HM. 1986. Gynoecious sex expression and stability in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Euphytica 35 : 899-903. doi: 10.1007/BF00028598
- More TA. 2002. Development and exploitation of tropical gynoecious lines in F hybrid of cucumber. Acta 1 Horticulture 588: 261-267. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.588.40
- Morelock TE and Correll JC. 2005. Spinach breeding in the mid-south. National Spinach Conference, Fayetteville, AR USA, pp14.
- Munshi AD, Kumar R and Panda B. 2007. Heterosis for yield and its component in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Vegetable Science 32: 133-135.
- Nilsen ET, Freeman J, Grene R and Tokuhisa J. 2014. A rootstock provides water conservation for a grafted commercial tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) line in response to mild drought conditions: A focus on vegetative growth and photosynthetic parameters. PLoS One 9 : e115380. doi : 10.1371/journal.pone.0115380
- Niu XK, Leung H and Williams PH. 1984. Sources and nature of resistance to downy mildew and turnip mosaic in Chinese cabbage. Journal of American Society of Horticultural Sciences 108: 115.
- Noll F. 1902. Fruchtbildingohnevorausgegangene bestaubung (parthenokarpie) bei der gurke. Gesellschaft fur Natur-u. Heilkundezu Bonn. 106: 149-62.
- Nuez F. 1986. Solanaceae breeding for protected cultivation. Acta Horticulture 191: 317-30. Doi: 10.17660/ ActaHortic.1986.191.36
- Orton TJ, Durgan ME and Hulbert SH. 1984. Studies on the inheritance of resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. apii in celery. Plant Disease 68: 574.
- Pereira MJZ, Massola JNS, Sussel AAB, Sala FC, Costa CP and Boiteux LS. 2011. Reacao de acessos de Capsicum ede progenies decruz amentosintere specificosaisolados de Colletotrichum acutatum. Hortic Brasileira 29, 569-576. Doi: 10.1590/S010205362011000400021
- Phillips RL. 1999. Research needs in heterosis. In: Coors JG and Pandey S. (eds.), Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops. American Society of AgronomyCrop Science Society of America, pp 501-507.
- Poulos MJ. 1994. Pepper breeding (Capsicum spp.): Achievements, Challenges and Possibilities. Plant Breeding 64: 143-154.
- Quiros CF. 1987. Breeding celery for disease resistance and improved quality, California Celery Research Advisory Board Annual Report. 1986-1987.
- Rajasekar M., Arumugam T and Ramesh KS. 2013. Influence of weather and growing environment on vegetable growth and yield. Journal of Horticulture and Forestry 5: 160-167. doi: 10.5897/jhf2013.0317
- Rivard CL and Louws FJ. 2008. Grafting to manage soil borne diseases in heirloom tomato production. Hort Sc i enc e 43: 2104-2111. doi : 10.21273/hortsci.43.7.2104
- Rivard CL, O’Connell S, Peet MM and Louws FJ. 2010. Grafting tomato with interspeciûc rootstock to manage diseases caused by Sclerotium rolfsii and southern root-knot nematode. Plant Disease 94: 101521. doi: 10.1094/pdis-94-8-1015
- Sanchez-Rodriguez E., Romero L and Ruiz MJ. 2013. Role of grafting in resistance to water stress in tomato plants: Ammonia production and assimilation. Journal of Plant Growth Regulators 32: 831-842. doi: 10.1007/s00344-013-9348-2
- Scott JW, Wang J and Hanson P. 2005. Breeding tomatoes for resistance to bacterial wilt, a global view. International Symposium on Tomato Diseases, Orlando, FL, pp 161-72.
- Serquan FC, Bachar J and Staub JE. 1997. Genetic analysis of yield components in cucumber at low plant density. Journal of American Society of Horticultural Science 12: 522-28.
- Singh B. 2012. Protected cultivation of horticultural crops in India: Challenges and opportunities. Agrotechnol 2: 51.
- Singh DK and Peter KV. 2014. Protected cultivation of horticultural crops. New India Publication Agency, New Delhi-110034.
- Singh HP and Malhotra SK. 2012. Current scenario and policy issues for protected cultivation of horticultural crops in India. Proceedings, National Seminar on Protected Cultivation of Vegetables and Flowers-A Value Chain Approach. GBPUAT, Pant Nagar, pp 920.
- Singh S and Bainsha NK. 2015. Analysis of Climate Change Impacts and their Mitigation Strategies on Vegetable Sector in Tropical Islands of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Indian Journal of Horticulture 2: 126.
- Singh T, Singh N, Bahuguna A, Nautiyal M and Sharma VK. 2014. Performance of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) hybrids for growth, yield and quality inside polyhouse under mid hill condition of Uttarakhand. American Journal of Drug Discovery Development 4: 202-09.
- Sokova D, Niamoye Y, Paul N, Oligorite A, Aminata D, Kadiadiatou G, Aissata T, Seribakatil E and Doule D. 2013. Overview of pepper (Capsicum sp.) breeding in West Africa. African Journal of Agricultural Research 8: 1108-1114.
- Stephenson AG. 1981. Flower and seed abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 12: 253-79.
- Sturtevant EL. 1890. Seedless fruits. Memoirs of the Torrey Botanical Club 1, 141-85.
- Talisha JJA, Sabah SS and Mahmoud MR. 2020. Effects of breeding methods and nitrogen fertilization on growth traits and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) yield under protected conditions. Plant Archives 20: 178-80.
- Tiwari R. 2015. Molecular characterization and genetical studies in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Doctoral Thesis, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India, pp 129.
- Traveset A. 1993. Deceptive fruits reduce insect seed predation in Pistacia terebinthus L. Evolutionary Ecology 7: 357-361.
- Turhan A, Ozmen N, Serbeci MS and Seniz V. 2011. Effects of grafting on different rootstocks on tomato fruit yield and quality. Horticultural Science 38: 142-149.
- Tuzel Y and Leonardi C. 2009. Protected cultivation in Mediterranean region: trends and needs. J Ege Univ Fac Agric 46: 215-223.
- Verdu M and Garcia-Fayos P. 1998. Ecological causes, function, and evolution of abortion and parthenocarpy in Pistacia lentiscus (Anacardiaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 76: 134-41.
- Vrcek IV, Samobor M, Bojic M, Medic-Saric M, Vukobratovic R., Erhatic R, Horvat D and Matota N Z. 2011. The effect of grafting on the antioxidant properties of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 9: 844-851.
- Wani KP, Singh PK, Amin A, Mushtaq F and Dar ZA. 2011. Protected cultivation of tomato, capsicum and cucumber under Kashmir Valley conditions. Asian Journal of Science and Technology 1: 56-61.
- Williamson VM. 1998. Root-knot resistance genes in tomato and their potential for future use. Annual Reviews on Phytopathology 36: 277-93.
- Yuen JE. 1991. Resistance to Peronospora parasitica in Chinese cabbage. Plant Disease 10.
- Evaluation of colocasia (Colocasia esculenta L.) genotypes for yield and quality attributes under natural farming conditions
Abstract Views :58 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, College of Agriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
2 KVK Bilaspur at Berthin, District Bilaspur-174 029, IN
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, College of Agriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
2 KVK Bilaspur at Berthin, District Bilaspur-174 029, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 48, No 01 (2022), Pagination: 119-125Abstract
The investigation was conducted during Kharif, 2020 at Research Farm of Research Sub Station Berthin, District Bilaspur, Himachal Pradeshin which 26 genotypes, collected within and outside the state were evaluated for yield and quality attributes in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RBD) with 3 replications. The promising genotypes identified based on mean performance for yield and quality attributes are LC-10 (collection from Baijnath of district Kangra, HP)was found best for highest total yield, cormel yield, cormel diameter, corm yield, number of cormels /plant, sugar and starch content (7 characters) followed by LC-15 (collection from Kolar of district Sirmour, HP)for total yield, cormel yield, cormel diameter, corm yield, crude protein and lowest oxalate content (6characters); LC-8 (collection form Gagret, Tehsil Amb of district Una, HP)recorded highest total yield, cormel yield, number of cormels /plant and total polyphenols (4 characters); LC-14(collection from Sarkaghat of district Mandi, HP) for total yield, cormelyield andnumber of cormels /plant (3 characters), LC-9 (collection from Village Bassi of district Mandi) for total yield, cormel yield and total polyphenols (3 characters). Based on the performance of these genotypes, they can be utilized as source of germplasm in colocasia improvement program under natural farming conditions.
Keywords
Colocasia, corm yield, cormel, quality attributes, natural farmingFull Text
References
- Angami T, Jha AK, Buragohain J, Deka BC, Verma VK and Nath A. 2015. Evaluation of taro (Colocasia esculenta L.) cultivars for growth, yield and quality attributes. Journal of Horticultural Science 10 (2): 183-189.
- Anonymous. 2017. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of United Nations. http:// www.fao.org/ faostat.
- AOAC. 1984. Official Methods of Analysis. 14th edition AOAC, Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington D. C. P 511-612.
- AOAC. 2000. Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington D.C. USA.
- Asokan PK, Hassan MA and Neelkumar PN. 1980. Quality attributes of colocasia. Agricultural Research Journal, Kerala 18 (1):102-103.
- Boampong R, Aboagye LM, Nyadanu D and M. 2018. Agro-morphological characterization of some taro (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott.) germplasms in Ghana. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science 10: 191-202.
- Bose TK, Kabir J, Maity TK, Parthasarathy VA and Som MG. 2003.Vegetable Crops, Vol 2. NayaUdyog Publishers, Kolkata.pp:413-442.
- Chadha ML, Kuo G and Gowda CLL. 2007. Comparative studies on morphological characters, yield, nutritional status and isozymes activity of some elite genotypes of taro [Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott var. antiquorum] grown in West Bengal. Acta Horticulture 75 (2): 219-224.
- Cheema DS, Singh H, Dhatt AS, Sidhu AS and Garg N. 2007. Studies on genetic variability and correlation for yield and quality traits in Arvi (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott). Acta Horticulture 752: 255-260.
- Dwivedi AK and Sen H. 1998. Performance of some elite genotypes of kachu (Colocasia esculenta var. antiquorum) in the gangetic alluvial zone of West Bengal. Horticultural Journal 11 (1): 83-89.
- Dwivedi AK and Sen H. 2001. Comparative study of some local taro (Colocasia esculenta var. antiquorum) cultivars of West Bengal. The Horticulture Journal 14 (2):149-153.
- enkinson DS and Ladd JN. 1981. Microbial Biomass in Soil: Measurement and Turnover. In: EA Paul and JD Ladd, Soil Bio Chemistry 5:415-471.
- Ghosh D, Chattopadhyay N, Bandhyopadhyay A and Hore JK. 2004. Evaluation of colocasia as an intercrop in arecanut. Haryana Journal of Horticultural Science 33 (3&4): 269-271.
- Hedge JE and Hofreiter BT. 1962. In: Carbohydrates Chemistry, 17, Academic Press, New York.
- James EO, Peterl A, Charles N and Joe IN. 2013. Chemical composition and effect of processing and flour particle size on physicochemical and organoleptic properties of cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta var. esculenta) flour. Nigerian Food Journal 31:113-122.
- Makkar HPS. 2003. Quantification of tannin in tree and shrub foliage. In: Makkar HPS (ed), A Laboratory Manual, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordecht, The Netherlands. p102-107.
- Makkar HPS. 2003. Quantification of tannins in tree and shrub foliage. In: Makkar HPS (ed), A Laboratory Manual, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordecht, The Netherlands. P 102-107.
- Palekar S. 2006. Shoonya Bandovalada Naisargika Krushi. Published by SwarupAnand, Agri Prakashna, Bengaluru, India. Printing, Calcutta 2: 509-513.
- Panse VG and Sukhatme PV. 1978. Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India.
- Purseglove JW. 1972. Tropical crops. Monocotyledons. Longman London.
- Rangana S. 1986. Handbook of Analysis and Quality Control for Fruits and Vegetable Products. Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Co. Ltd, New Delhi pp 99-112.
- Rao BV and Lakshmi BKM. 2012. Multilocation trial on (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) Technical programme of work done report of 2010-2011.AICRP on tuber crops (other than potato). Vegetable Research Station, IARI, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad.
- Sadasivam S and Manickam A. 1992. In: Biochemical Methods for Agricultural sciences, Wiley Eastern Limited, New Delhi. p 11-12.
- Sefa-Dedeh S and Agyir-Sackey EK. 2004. Chemical composition and the effect of processing on oxalate content of cocoyam Xanthosomas agittifolium and Colocasia esculenta cormels. Food Chemistry 85 (4): 479-487.
- Singh JP, Singh MK and Singh RD. 1993. Response of nitrogen and potassium on growth, yield and quality of Colocasia. Indian Journal of Horticulture 50 (3): 265-268.
- Singh JP, Singh MK and Singh RD. 1995. Effect of season on performance of arum (Colocasia esculenta var. esculenta) cultivars. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 65 (2): 123-126.
- Singh V, Singh PK, Kumar K, Shahi BP and Dwivedi SV. 2003. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for yield and its attributing traits in arvi (Colocasia esculenta var. antiquorum). Indian Journal of Horticulture 60 (4): 376-380.
- Sinha B, Pal H, Tarafdar J and Mitra S. 2006. Comparative studies on morphological characters, yield, nutritional status and isozymes activity of some elite genotypes of taro (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott var. antiquorum) grown in West Bengal. In: International Conference on Indigenous Vegetables and Legumes. Prospectus for Fighting Poverty, Hunger and Malnutrition p.219-224.
- Sood S, Kumar Naveen, Chandel KS and Sharma Parveen. 2011. Determination of genetic variation for morphological and yield traits in bell pepper (Capsicum annuum var. grossum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 81(7): 590-594.
- Sreenivasa MN, Naik N and Bhat SN. 2011. Nutrient status and microbial load of different organic liquid manures. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 24 (4): 583-584.
- Sudershan S. 2006. Cultivar differences in the nutritional attributes in Colocasia and amorphophallus. Proceedings of fourteenth triennial symposium on roots and tubers for sustainable development and food security: Issues and strategies.
- Tattiyakul J, Asavasaksakul S and Pradipasena P. 2006. Chemical and physical properties of flour extracted from taro Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott grown in different regions of Thailand. Journal of Science Society of Thailand 32: 279-284.
- Temesgen M and Retta N. 2015. Nutritional potential, health and food security benefits of taro, Colocasia esculenta L.: A review. Food Science and Quality Management 36:23-30.
- Vinning G. 2003. Select markets for taro, sweet potato and yam. RIRDC Project No.UCQ-13A.
- Performance of parthenocarpic cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) genotypes for yield and quality characters under protected environment
Abstract Views :157 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, College of Agriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062,, IN
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, College of Agriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062,, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 48, No 2 (2022), Pagination: 220-224Abstract
The experimental material comprises eight parthenocarpic cucumber genotypes to study the comparative performance of these genotypes for yield and quality characteristics under protected environment. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with three replications in spring-summer during 2020 at Vegetable Research Farm, Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur. DDPCG1 and DDPCG4 are good performing genotypes for yield related characters taken under study. Among all genotypes, DDPCG1 had maximum fruit weight, number of fruits per plant and yield/plant. DDPCG4 took minimum days to first fruit picking and maximum harvest duration. Lowest nodal position of first female flower, maximum fruit diameter and vine length were noticed in DDPCG5. Forquality parameters, DDPCG5 had maximum pericarp thickness and TSS.Keywords
Cucumber, gynoecious, protected, quality and yield.Full Text
References
- Ahirwar CS and Singh DK. 2018. Assessment of genetic variability in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7: 813-22.
- Bhagwat A, Srinivasa V, Bhammanakati S and Shubha AS. 2018. Evaluation of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) genotypes under hill zone of Karnataka, India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7: 837-842.
- Choudhary H, Singh DK and Damke SR. 2015. Genetic variability in Cucumis sativus var. hardwickii: key to cucumber improvement. International Journal of Basic and Applied Agricultural Research 13: 340-43.
- Cochran WG and Cox GM. 1963. Experimental Designs. Asia Publishing House, Bombay, 293-316.
- Dingal DK, Patil SS, Birada MS and Mantur SM. 2018. Influence of different protected conditions on growth and yield of parthenocarpic cucumber (Cucumis sativus) hybrids. Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7: 1619-1624.
- Dogra LK. 2012. Genetic evaluation of some hybrids of cucumber under modified naturally ventilated greenhouse in mid hills of Western Himalayas. M.Sc. Thesis, p 92. Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, India.
- Ene CO, Ogbonna PE, Agbo CU and Chukwudi UP. 2016. Studies of phenotypic and genotypic variation in sixteen cucumber genotypes. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 76: 307-313.
- Jakhar RK, Singh AK and Kumawat N. 2016. Yields attributes and yield of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) cultivars as influenced by growing conditions in arid zone of Rajasthan. Environment and Ecology 34: 2258- 2261.
- Kaur M and Sharma P. 2021. Recent advances in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 97: 3-23.
- Nagamani GV, Kumar JSA, Reddy TBM, Rajesh AM, Amarananjundeswara H, Reddy RLR and Doddabasappa B. 2019. Performance of different parthenocarpic cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) hybrids for yield and yield attributing traits under shade net house. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 8: 978-982.
- Pal S, Sharma HR, Rai AK and Bhardwaj RK. 2017. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic gain for yield and quality traits in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). An International Quarterly Journal of Life Sciences 11: 1985-1990.
- Pushpalatha N, Anjanappa M, Devappa V and Pitchaimuthu M. 2016. Genetic variability and heritability for growth and yield in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Journal of Horticulture Sciences 11: 33-36.
- Ranjan P, Gangopadhyay KK, Bag MK, Roy A, Srivastava R, Bhardwaj R And Dutta M. 2015. Evaluation of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) germplasm for agronomic traits and disease resistance and estimation of genetic variability. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 85: 234 239.
- Shah KN, Rana DK and Singh V. 2018. Evaluation of genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) for various quantitative, qualitative and seed characters. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7: 3296- 3303.
- Sharma AK, Vidyasagar K and Pathania NK. 2000. Studies on combining ability for earliness and marketable fruit yield in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 26: 54-61.
- Sharma P, Dhillon NS, Kumar P and Mehta P. 2019. Evaluation of parthenocarpic cucumber genotypes for fruit yield and its contributing traits under protected environment of N-W Himalayas. International Journal of Chemistry Studies 3: 04-06.
- Sharma P, Kaur M, Shilpa, Sharma A and Bhardwaj N. 2021. Breeding vegetables for protected cultivation: A review. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 47: 1-17.
- Sharma S, Kumar R and Sharma HR. 2017. Studies on variability, heritability and genetic gain in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Indian Journal of Ecology 44: 829-33.
- Singh Y, Safiullah, Verma A, Sharma S and Sekhon BS. 2017. Genetic evaluation of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) genotypes for yield and its contributing traits under mid-hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh, India. Environment & Ecology 35: 3621-3626
- Appraisal of lentil varieties for better performance in Bilaspur district of Himachal Pradesh
Abstract Views :154 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bilaspur-174 029,, IN
2 Department of Tea Husbandry and Technology, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062,, IN
1 CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bilaspur-174 029,, IN
2 Department of Tea Husbandry and Technology, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062,, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 48, No 2 (2022), Pagination: 248-251Abstract
Lentil (Lens esculenta) is commonly known as masur and it is important pulse legume crop in India. Lentil has the ability to fix nitrogen and grow in marginal environments. The productivity of lentil is generally low in Bilaspur district of Himachal Pradesh, mainly due to lack of improved varieties and low technical knowhow. Therefore, the present study was conducted in the seventeen villages of district Bilaspur of Himachal Pradesh. Twenty five farmers’ fields were randomly selected and sown two high yielding improved varieties of lentil namely Vipasha and Markandey with one check variety already grown by the farmers. Among the varieties assessed, variety Vipasha proved to be the best with highest number of pods/plant (92.4) and minimum incidence of disease of 1.5 per cent resulting in the highest yield of 6.60 q/ha followed by Markandey with disease incidence of 2.1 per cent, 72.8 pods/plant and yield of 6.1 q/ ha. Hence, it was inferred that local variety must be replaced with Vipasha variety of lentil followed by Markandey.Keywords
Extension gap, lentil, technology, varieties, yield.Full Text
References
- Abraham R. 2015. Lentil (Lens culinary Medikus) current status and future prospect of production in Ethiopia. Advances in Plants & Agricultural Research 2 (2): 00040.
- Anuratha A, Ramasubramanian M and Chandirakala R. 2020. Assessment of green gram varieties for better yield in Nagapattinam district of Tamil Nadu. Journal of Krishi Vigyan 9 (1): 12-15.
- Bacchi M, Leone M, Mercati F, Preiti G, Sunseri F and Monti M. 2010. Agronomic evaluation and genetic characterization of different accessions in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik). Italian Journal of Agronomy 4: 303–314.
- Kindie Y and Nigusie Z. 2018. Participatory evaluation of lentil varieties in Wag-lasta, Eastern Amhara, Cogent Food & Agriculture 4:1, 1561171.
- Kumar S and Singh RN. 2014. Effect of vermicompost and Rhizobium application on productivity of mungbean sown after wheat. RAU Journal of Research 24 (1-2): 26-28.
- Kushwah S, Kumar S and Singh SRK. 2016. Adoption of improved late sown mustard cultivation practices–A case study in Bihar. Journal of Community Mobilization and Sustainable Development 11 (1): 19-23.
- Samui K, Maitra S, Roy DR, Mondal AK and Saha D. 2000. Evaluation of frontline demonstration programme on groundnut. Journal of Indian Society of Coastal Agricultural Research 18 (2): 180-183.
- Sandhu BS and Dhaliwal NS. 2016. Evaluation of frontline demonstration programme on summer moong in South Western Punjab. Journal of Food Legume 29 (3 & 4): 245-248.
- Yasin G. 2015. Current research in agricultural sciences performance evaluation and adaptation of lentil varieties in Lima, Gumur, and Damot Gale districts of Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Current Research in Agricultural Sciences 2 (2): 53–59